semperfiona: (rosa crowned)
semperfiona ([personal profile] semperfiona) wrote2005-02-06 11:35 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

I just can't get my head round it. Ray throws a fit if I let Rosa have a temporary tattoo--and he has rubbed her back raw trying to get them off--but on the other hand he gives her makeup!

He says tattoos--even temporary ones--aren't "ladylike". But apparently in his mind makeup on a five-year-old is. To me it's oversexualization of a child, or at the very least introducing conventional 'femininity' way too early. (Which would be "ever".)

As an aside, apparently I can spell feminininity but I don't seem to know when to stop.

[identity profile] beckyzoole.livejournal.com 2005-02-08 04:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I have nothing against letting little girls play dress-up with Tinkerbelle make-up -- or even painting red stripes on their bodies with lipstick, as long as they don't get it all over the carpet.

But what the heck does he have against a temporary tattoo? Not "ladylike"? I have never heard that one before!

[identity profile] beckyzoole.livejournal.com 2005-02-08 04:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Correction: I have nothing against letting little kids in general play dress-up with make-up. Let boys put red and blue stripes on their faces, just like the grownups.

You could tell Ray that it is, after all, Savage to paint one's face, and, in your opinion, not very lady-like at all.