(no subject)
Mar. 13th, 2007 05:05 pmThis morning I passed a car with the following two bumper stickers: one that read "Doing my part to piss off the heathen left" and one that reproduced the ACLU logo exactly, except that the C was replaced by a red hammer-and-sickle.
Exactly what does an organization that fights for our Bill of Rights have to do with a fallen authoritarian regime? (Other than that both are "something [that driver] doesn't like", of course.) Just point out to me one case of the Soviet Union's support for freedom of speech or the
press, or of the right of the people to assemble, or ...
The first sticker amused me, briefly, as a twist on the far-more-common version "Doing my part to piss off the Religious Right." But it's insidious in a way that I don't think the original is: there is a big distinction made by those capital letters. "The Religious Right" is a faction, a more-or-less defined group. "The heathen left" imputes heathen-ness to every member of the left. And then there's the idiocy of treating heathen and religious as opposites: the opposite of "religious" is clearly and obviously "irreligious"!
Exactly what does an organization that fights for our Bill of Rights have to do with a fallen authoritarian regime? (Other than that both are "something [that driver] doesn't like", of course.) Just point out to me one case of the Soviet Union's support for freedom of speech or the
press, or of the right of the people to assemble, or ...
The first sticker amused me, briefly, as a twist on the far-more-common version "Doing my part to piss off the Religious Right." But it's insidious in a way that I don't think the original is: there is a big distinction made by those capital letters. "The Religious Right" is a faction, a more-or-less defined group. "The heathen left" imputes heathen-ness to every member of the left. And then there's the idiocy of treating heathen and religious as opposites: the opposite of "religious" is clearly and obviously "irreligious"!
no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 10:12 pm (UTC)*looks around*
I know I've got company. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 10:53 pm (UTC)Your interpretation is probably more accurate, sadly.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 01:50 am (UTC)The error they're making is the same one as with the "heathen left" that you mention: that all communists are alike.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 05:58 am (UTC)Repeal the Constitution. Long Live King George III !
Or maybe that historical commentary is a little too subtle for that kind of mind. Perhaps
The Right is Right. Repeal the Constitution.
would get the message across?
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 12:33 pm (UTC)Or something like that.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 12:44 pm (UTC)Why is it the Religious Right, and not the Christian Right??? I mean, I'm fairly certain that they're not really meaning the Muslim, Buddhist, Pagan AND Christian Right. Are Christian Republicans the only religious people in the US???
And if they're trying to piss off the Heathen Left, I'm assuming that means that they are a part of the Religious (Christian?) Right. Last I checked, purposely pissing people off is NOT a Christian activity. I mean, we never played mock the heathens in sunday school. At least not in MY sunday school...
double plus un-god
Date: 2007-03-14 02:14 pm (UTC)mock the heathens
Date: 2007-03-14 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 03:52 pm (UTC)Not the way it's generally used. Sure, that might be the meaning here, but its usual connotation seems to be "one whose religion the speaker doesn't like", and its more recent, less common usage is specifically "member of the Asatru religion".
Even the phrase "godless heathen": the G is usually capitalized so one is meant to understand it to mean "person who does not believe in [the Christian] God".
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 04:56 pm (UTC)Re: double plus un-god
Date: 2007-03-14 11:25 pm (UTC)You increment before un-godding?
Re: double plus un-god
Date: 2007-03-15 01:10 pm (UTC)