semperfiona: (Default)
On the phone with the ex-husband, discussing next weekend. I tell him my parents are coming for the concert. He says, "Are they going to be okay with that show. I mean there's a lot of homosexuals there..."

I say, "They'll be fine, and also that word is only used by people who are being disparaging."

He says, "What am I supposed to call people who have same-sex attraction?"

I say, "That phrase also is only used by people who are disparaging."

He says he's apparently not politically correct but he doesn't mean to be insulting. I do not have either time or inclination to teach him appropriate language usage as I am sitting at my work desk with half the office around me. But seriously, he sounds exactly like the oh-so-concerned "love the sinner hate the sin" crowd.

Wish I'd thought to answer his question with "People."
semperfiona: (Default)
My second surgery is over (last Thursday), all went well, and I am writing this to you without glasses on. I feel like the brighter my surroundings are, the better I can see. I think it's for the same reason you see better when you squint: if my pupils are smaller the focus is more concentrated. Upshot is, I can see well enough to drive without glasses in the daytime, but not at night. So far I've either stayed home at night or gotten rides, but I ordered a pair of -1 diopter nearsighted cheater glasses, and they should have arrived by the time I get home, so hopefully I'll be able to drive myself to chorus practice.

---

Speaking of "hopefully": why is it that language purists get so het up about that one word and want people to use ridiculous stilted circumlocutions like "it is to be hoped that"?

It's just one instance of a perfectly common usage of adverbs: they don't modify anything specific in the sentence but instead express the overall mood of the whole sentence.

"Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn."

"Sadly, there's no way I can get that done on time."

"Unfortunately, you are not a winner."

---

In the grand scheme of things (i.e. the overall prevalence of misogyny in the medical system), I suppose it's not a big deal. But it's denial of agency and refusal to take a woman's word on her stated knowledge of her own body.

I have now had three procedures this year that involved anesthesia. And prior to every single one, I had to give a urine sample so they could test for pregnancy. Never mind that I knew for a definite and irrefutable fact that I was not and could not be pregnant and told them so[*]. If I refuse to give the urine sample, no procedure. One nurse even said, "You could be a nun. The anesthesiologists still require it."

[*] And yes, I know there are women who don't know they are pregnant until quite late in the pregnancy. And that there are far too many women who are ignorant of the basic mechanics (for which I blame the religious nutjobs). So yes, there are reasons. Still, if I am willing to sign a document that states that I have not had PIV sex (or any sex involving a penis, if you want to be extra careful) since my last period--why not accept that?

---

In other news, Tammie has gotten a painting bug. She has bought a bunch of acrylic paints and a load of canvases (some of them VERY LARGE) and has been a painting fiend for the last few weeks. It's fun to watch her, but I'm feeling like we should finish some of the quilts we were working on in December/January--or at least put away the sewing chaos that has taken over the living room. I want to finish mine at least, though. But we don't have a big enough table nor enough clear floorspace to lay it out and make the quilt/batting/backing sandwich so we need to take it to the local sewing shop and use theirs. Maybe this weekend.

She is like this: she gets very enthusiastic about a project, and works on it feverishly for some time, and then the enthusiasm fades or she gets a new enthusiasm, and a lot of unfinished projects are the result.

Admittedly, I'm the same, so I shouldn't really judge. (And there's another of those adverbs.)

Some words

Sep. 21st, 2017 09:47 am
semperfiona: American flag superimposed with "American. Liberal. Voter." (liberal)
Words that might be used for the current occupant of the White House, without invoking looksism, ageism, sizeism, sexism, ableism or ethnic slurs. Even if the very sight of his face or sound of his voice makes me cringe and shudder.

Boor
Ignorant
Pig-ignorant
Ignoramus
Bombastic
Reckless
Bull in a china shop
White supremacist
Would-be dictator
Chickenhawk
Coward
Hater
Self-absorbed
Solipsist
Fascist
Deplorable
Despicable
Reprehensible
Thoughtless
Wrongheaded
Mercenary (adj)
Imperialist
Colonialist
Capitalist pig-dog
Thin-skinned
Calamity
Disaster
Irresponsible
Soulless
Traitor
Unamerican
Racist
Sexist
Sexual predator
Sexual harasser
Cheater
Adulterer
Defaulter
Failure
Bankrupt
Incompetent
Liar
Misogynist
Pusillanimous
Belligerent
Bully
Unethical
Unjust
Malicious
Self-aggrandizing
Obtuse

I'm avoiding "Immoral", although I believe it applies, because definitions differ among subcultures. I think he's immoral according to any definition I've ever heard, but one doesn't want to spend good insult time arguing over the definitions of the insults.

If you're willing to use profanity...
Asshole
Fuckhead
Douchebag (Yes some people think this term is sexist. I disagree, but if you do, then don't use it)
Shitstain
The trouble with these is their imprecision and general applicability to quite a lot of people. I mean, "asshole" might be that guy that just cut me off in traffic. That's several orders of magnitude less assholish than That Guy I Did Not Vote For.
semperfiona: American flag superimposed with "American. Liberal. Voter." (liberal)
This election has poisoned a lot of my vocabulary. “Tremendous” and “huge” are both suspect, unless I am intentionally evoking the ghost of the toupeed pumpkinhead, and why would I want to do that. Back in 2008 I lost “you bet” and “you betcha” to Sarah Palin. Those were less painful losses, as I’ve mostly moved away from the Northern Midwest where my accent picked them up.

But now I can’t use the word “trump”, even in a card game, without cringing inwardly. Pinochle and hearts and sheepshead and euchre and even Five Crowns are dear to my competitive little heart, and the word “trump” is rather important to all those games.
Basically, if it’s a card game with trick-taking and trump cards, I’m likely to love it. (Except I never got the hang of bridge. Mostly because I stopped hanging out with the person I started to take bridge lessons with, and the only other person I knew who played was my grandmother, who had dementia by then and could no longer play.)

Pinochle was the family game. Both my dad’s family and my mom’s, even though they were from completely different backgrounds and locations. So of course they taught me and my sister to play from the age of eight or so. It was a big deal when we were both good enough at it that we could partner each other and hold our own against our parents. It’s still the default activity whenever I’m around my parents or aunts, although neither Rosa nor her cousins play, nor did most of mine ever learn, because my aunts didn’t marry men who played or were willing to learn.

Back when I was still married to Ray, we tried teaching him. He learned, sort of, but was a very bad loser, and quickly began to refuse to play. He will still occasionally trot out “I once maimed a man playing pinochle” if the topic happens to come up. He is one of those people who, having once found a phrase or saying funny, will repeat it endlessly until you are ready to strangle him to make it stop.

In high school, I taught a group of my friends to play pinochle, and we used to play every day over lunch. But I lived in Wisconsin, where the trick-taking game of choice is sheepshead, so of course I wanted to learn to play. I can’t tell you how many times I was told it was impossible to learn unless you’d grown up with it. My parents, having come from elsewhere and moved to Wisconsin as adults, didn’t play. Presumably their friends also refused to teach them. In any case, eventually I convinced someone to teach me, and played it for several years on church retreats and such, until I moved out of the state and no longer had anyone to play with.
I fetched up in Indiana, where the local game was euchre. And people were willing to teach it, even. Again, played for several years, and then moved out of state.

Now I’m lucky if I get to play cards once every six months or so, for no particularly good reason except lack of convenient flat surface to play on. Tammie knows pinochle, but there are only two of us and it’s really not that great as a two-person game. Though I did meet someone over the weekend who knows the game. Hmmm.
semperfiona: (amber)
Fiona...is sitting in a library in a big old house in Westchester NY with Corwin.

This morning I decided it was time for my quasi-sesquiannual reread, or in this case re-listen, of the Chronicles of Amber. My commute takes three chapters.

I recently reread (or re-listened) to two of the other books on the quasi-sesquiannual reread list: Tigana by Guy Gavriel Kay and The Lord of the Rings; this is the remaining one. Those three books (or series) are, along with The Fionavar Tapestry, my desert island book list: the books I cannot live without, no matter how well I know them I have to reimmerse myself in their words and their worlds every so often.

(I spent the walk in from the car trying to determine what is the appropriate word for 'approximately every year-and-a-half'. Can't use semi- as a prefix to mean 'about', since in the context of a measurement of time it always means 'half'. Guess we better go with quasi-. Not sure I've ever actually seen or heard sesquiannual, but it ought to mean what I want it to, so.)
semperfiona: (demon baby)
Rosa doesn't swear. At all. Which is pretty weird in that she lives in a household of people who swear all the time, but she says she just doesn't see the need. It's probably just as well for her, since I wouldn't put it past her father's family to punish her for it.

Instead, she has taken to using absurd multisyllabic multi-word phrases as insults. I think the surrealists would be proud.

Some examples:

Mayonnaise kumquat
Inconsiderate microwaved piece of soap
Pretentious crouton
Egg covered mailbox flag
semperfiona: (demon baby)
Yesterday, Rosa inquired, "Mom, how do you spell sha-den-frood?"

I said, "It's sha-den-froy-duh, and it's spelled schadenfreude."

I love her vocabulary, even if she's got the same 'met it in writing, not sure how to pronounce it' that is common to those of us who read widely.

She's currently reading _His Majesty's Dragon_ and loving it to bits, B T dubs.

These two facts are not necessarily related; I'm pretty sure schadenfreude doesn't occur in that book or at least not named as such. The word is too newly established in English to belong in a book about the Napoleonic Wars. (Etymonline has it dated 1922 and a reference from 1852 to its existence in German. I don't have a membership to the OED online, and our hardcopy is at home.)
semperfiona: (rosa crowned)
While cleaning out old papers, I just found some very old sheets of yellow paper on which I had written down Rosa's known vocabulary at the time.

2/11/01 )

3/10/01 )

Not-a-word

Feb. 27th, 2013 08:27 am
semperfiona: (dragon)
I've been looking at fonts this morning. I've got two tattoos in mind that require them but I'm very picky. One I'm thinking about is a text tattoo, of 'there is a crack in everything/it's how the light gets in' (punctuation tbd). So I have the sample sentence set to 'there is a crack in everything'. Didn't take long at all before both 'crack' and 'everything' no longer look like words. Oddly enough, they just changed back again now that I'm typing them in a normal size and a font I'm used to.

The other is just '&', at a nice large size. That is even trickier for font selection, since designers tend to get fancy with the special characters. I'm not quite sure what fanciness level I want.
semperfiona: (Default)
I went to Wisconsin this past weekend to visit my parents. People who've been reading this journal for a while will know they are very devout Christians, who never use profane or obscene language. While visiting, I always strive to curtail my own rather salty vocabulary.

So it rather confounded me when, on the first day, my mother called some pesky problem "those buggers". I dithered over whether to enlighten her on the meaning of the phrase, but decided all it would accomplish would be her mortification. Couldn't see the point of that, so I kept my amusement to myself.

Something similar happened a few years ago at work. That time, my coworker looked up the word himself, to his great consternation. After skimming fourteen months of old posts, I found it in 2004: my coworker embarrasses himself quoting Austin Powers
semperfiona: (misbehave)
So I just discovered that I seem to have deleted some work-in-progress...and I swore under my breath: "Ah, SHARK!"

I think I like it.
semperfiona: (work motto)
I just spent a tedious half hour watching a sexual harassment prevention training video. Lots of blatant examples of bad behavior, but I am feeling the need for vengeance on behalf of the English language.

"Intimidating or demeaning language is automatically sexual harassment." Hello? It is most certainly harassment, and is very likely to be discrimination, depending on what was said, but in what world is intimidation part of sex?

An example from one of the vignettes: "What's the difference between Bigfoot and a smart woman? Bigfoot has been spotted!" Discrimination and misogyny, absolutely; harassment if it keeps up, certainly, but where's the sexual content in that? Yet the narrator kept insisting that it was sexual harassment.

Why can't they just say that harassment OF ANY KIND is unacceptable, without having to stretch definitions beyond their breaking point?
semperfiona: (knitting)
I subscribed to Knitting Daily. The recent discussions have been about shaping, which is fine, useful and interesting. But I'm being aggravated by the writer's continual cutesy references to breasts as The Girls or The Ladies. Never does she use the word breasts. Grrr!

"stove in"

Feb. 27th, 2008 12:16 pm
semperfiona: (Default)
T'other day we drove past a damaged vehicle which I didn't see, and when I asked what Chris had been commenting on, he said, "A car with its side stove in."

At which point I wondered aloud what the present tense verb was. Stave, steve, stove, maybe it's not a verb at all...?

Here's what dictionary.com has to say: short version: it's stave )
semperfiona: (entitlement couch)
Late last night, my sleepy brain came up with this phrase: "entitlement couch". It's a red velvet fainting couch, that one swoons onto when stapling one's hand to one's forehead is insufficiently dramatic to portray the outrageous slings and arrows one is suffering.
semperfiona: (Default)
I just saw this on [livejournal.com profile] stlpdheadlines:

Man, 18, shot to death at ESL
club


I've lived in St. Louis since 1990, and my linguistics degree is even
older than that, but I still read this as "English-as-Second-Language".
Took me a while to realize it meant "East St. Louis".
semperfiona: (version stupid)
My fingers on autopilot just produced the interesting construction "anythat".
semperfiona: (scrabble)
What is the collective noun for a group of rats?


Profile

semperfiona: (Default)
semperfiona

September 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
2223242526 2728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 11:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios