The Casual Vacancy, by JK Rowling
Feb. 12th, 2013 04:58 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
semperfionaNothing like Harry Potter whatsoever, in case anyone was actually wondering. I’ve picked it up several times in various bookstores, and put it down again, not wanting to spend $20+ on something I wasn’t sure I was going to like. Finally I put a hold on it at the library, and it turned up last week. I was the first borrower. Shiny.
The vacancy of the title is an empty seat on a town council. The incumbent dies in the first chapter, leaving his seat to be a bone of contention among the remaining councillors and other townspeople. There are factions, political issues, classism issues, and simple intrapersonal feuds. There are dysfunctional marriages, dysfunctional partnerships, and dysfunctional parent-child relationships. There are drug abuse, child neglect, and sexual assaults.
I’m not entirely sure why I finished the book, to be honest. Possibly because I kept wanting to see how much more horrible the people in it could manage to be to each other, or whether someone would eventually behave well (spoiler: they don't). None of the parts are particularly pleasant, but somehow the whole becomes fascinating. Like watching a train wreck in progress, to coin a cliché.
The vacancy of the title is an empty seat on a town council. The incumbent dies in the first chapter, leaving his seat to be a bone of contention among the remaining councillors and other townspeople. There are factions, political issues, classism issues, and simple intrapersonal feuds. There are dysfunctional marriages, dysfunctional partnerships, and dysfunctional parent-child relationships. There are drug abuse, child neglect, and sexual assaults.
I’m not entirely sure why I finished the book, to be honest. Possibly because I kept wanting to see how much more horrible the people in it could manage to be to each other, or whether someone would eventually behave well (spoiler: they don't). None of the parts are particularly pleasant, but somehow the whole becomes fascinating. Like watching a train wreck in progress, to coin a cliché.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2013-02-13 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-13 04:40 pm (UTC)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yHsuFaDBYE
no subject
Date: 2013-03-02 01:19 am (UTC)The bad guys were bad guys. The good guys were bad guys. The freakin' victims were bad guys. The only good people were a pair of children and a mute housekeeper.
And yet, it turned out to be a good film. How does this happen?